"Darling, would you put the MDF toilet seat back down when you're done?"
Women tend to make assumptive questions, which function more like commands rather than questions, don't they?
So how do you respond to such question disguised commands?
Poor answer:
"Suuure, honey!"
Good answer:
"No."
Better answer:
"Maybe."
Meanwhile, you're actions say 'No'.
Best answer:
"Woman! Would I ask you to put the MDF toilet seat back up when you're done?"
Catering to women's world of expectations is equivalent to selling the Soul into slavery. And when it comes to the 'toilet seat up, toilet seat down' issue, it's somewhat profound in that other than sex, here we confront the practical side-effects of our sexualities.
Does one sexuality dominant the other's? If so, whose sexuality is dominating the union?
To have a woman demand that you put the toilet seat down is a subtle way of communicating that your masculinity is unacceptable, that her 'femininity' must rule.
You can identify whether a woman controls her man by whether their MDF toilet seat is up or down -- for though it may seem trivial, it's not. Control in this issue usually corresponds with all other issues and decisions.
This simply is a key area in which it shows up.
We hear some say, "Compromise! Compromise! Compromise!"
But what is compromise, really? To sacrifice the Ownership of Life!
And to sacrifice ownership of your life to women's expectations, you become a peasant-slave rather than a king-servant.
Keep in mind of course, there is a sea of difference between influence and control. They are inherently different operations. For certainly, I'm not arguing that you 'revelliously' leave the toilet seat up to make a statement.
What I'm saying is that you think for yourself instead of crumbling to demands with no real authority over your freedom. And loss of freedom always begins with small compromises in which, at that moment, you seem to benefit.
But in the long term, it was just a taming instrument. A mere bribe.
So be alert!
